![]() ![]() and I assume the standard map view is just a different representation of the same model used for the "satellite" view. I understand blurring out licence plates and "adult themed" stickers and even faces but why get rid of everything? It gives me unrealistic expectations of places like Tampa and Columbus.Īnd the current satellite view on Google is *NOT* just compiled photographs - that's exactly why the thread was started! It's now a detailed 3D computer model of the world. You bring up a point I have wondered about for a long time: why do street view images always look so desolate? I look at some street view images and I do not see many people or cars or activity where there should be. If it were a two-way street, there would be a yellow line pained on the street. White lines indicate multiple lanes headed in the same direction. I can tell by the street sign nearest the camera and the lines painted on the street. The image of Tulsa is a one way street with traffic going away from the camera. I wouldn't necessarily make a case for adding traffic to an empty street just for that purpose, but the opposite is happening here traffic is being removed in order to "censor" the image. However you can add the cars back in, and then the answer jumps out at you. You could even look at a paper map and see if there are any arrows.Īn empty satellite image doesn't offer any clues. Sure, you can find out if you look hard enough. Going back to the image of Tulsa can you easily tell if that empty street is one-way or bi-directional? Is Google Earth just a navigation tool too? If you are going to add satellite imagery, it suggests something else. Maps (both digital and paper) already come with empty roads, and not a vehicle in sight. You don't need a satellite image if all you need is navigation. It’s a navigation tool so you can get to where you need to go. Granted this method doesn't always work, especially if the facility is so new it's not even on the satellite image, but it works most of the time. Where is it you would like me to go." Guard points to the general area where I need to go, and I'll use the satellite view to navigate around the facility. At that point, I just whip out my phone, pull up Google Maps, and tell the guard "Okay, we're here. ![]() At some of these facilities I go to, the places are so large and the security guard is telling me turn here, turn there, it can sometimes be impossible to keep up with everything. Like I said, I've used the satellite view on Google Maps for navigation before. And Satellite view is just a compiling of.photographs. Those are called photographs.Īnd that is why Google has Maps, Satellite view is not for navigation. I thought the point of Google maps was to provide an image that was of interest to the general public. Surely there are specialist applications that cater for surveyors and geologists and those that require "pure" images? Has anyone noticed this at other airports? If this is a copywrite or trademark issue, why don't they just blur the titles? Why photoshop them out all together? It is really disappointing, as these aerial maps really tell a story that other pictures can't. and you can see half of a Southwest 737 cut off by picture overlay. I also wondered if they were in the process of doing this at SEA as well, as the entire south half of the airport is empty. I thought maybe they pieced shots together at a quiet time, when they might have clearance to fly low over the airport, but if you look at Concourse G, you can see shadows under some of the jetways, and not under others, suggesting that jetway is at a plane, and it was taken out of the image. There are a few taxiing, but if you click on Globe, those disappear too. The other day though, I noticed, it doesn't look like they have updated maps since the last time I looked, construction seems to be at the same stage, but all the planes at the airport are gone. I have been watching the progress of construction at SFO on Google Maps, and while I know they don't update maps very often, they have a couple times since construction of Terminal 1 started. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |